<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: REBOOT: Dean Street Interchange and Viaduct</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gcpvd.org/2008/11/17/reboot-dean-street-interchange-and-viaduct/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gcpvd.org/2008/11/17/reboot-dean-street-interchange-and-viaduct/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:59:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.gcpvd.org/2008/11/17/reboot-dean-street-interchange-and-viaduct/comment-page-1/#comment-82015</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gcpvd.org/?p=506#comment-82015</guid>
		<description>As someone who currently lives near the Atwells-Dean intersection and someone who would bike or walk Dean St. to get to Smith Hill/Elmhurst, I have to say the first thing that needs to be fixed on Dean St. is the Atwells-Dean intersection.  Not only is it not pedestrian friendly (the crossing signals don&#039;t even work), it&#039;s dangerous for cars (the red lights have no delay, meaning the minute one turns red, the other is turning green).

The size of the intersection is also ridiculous.  While I can understand the need for 3 lanes of traffic coming up to Atwells, to go in one of 3 directions, there&#039;s the equivalent of 4 lanes with the way the road is setup.  It should come at a nice square right angle to Atwells.

In my opinion, the rest of Dean St. is less of a priority, but this section, in an extremely walkable area with tons of people out and about on a daily basis all year is a hazard.

The second part the should be dealt with is making the crossings safe by the highway entrances and around the river.  The road doesn&#039;t even need to be 2 lanes north of the river.  There&#039;s never enough traffic there to warrant that as half the cars turn towards the mall/Foundry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who currently lives near the Atwells-Dean intersection and someone who would bike or walk Dean St. to get to Smith Hill/Elmhurst, I have to say the first thing that needs to be fixed on Dean St. is the Atwells-Dean intersection.  Not only is it not pedestrian friendly (the crossing signals don&#8217;t even work), it&#8217;s dangerous for cars (the red lights have no delay, meaning the minute one turns red, the other is turning green).</p>
<p>The size of the intersection is also ridiculous.  While I can understand the need for 3 lanes of traffic coming up to Atwells, to go in one of 3 directions, there&#8217;s the equivalent of 4 lanes with the way the road is setup.  It should come at a nice square right angle to Atwells.</p>
<p>In my opinion, the rest of Dean St. is less of a priority, but this section, in an extremely walkable area with tons of people out and about on a daily basis all year is a hazard.</p>
<p>The second part the should be dealt with is making the crossings safe by the highway entrances and around the river.  The road doesn&#8217;t even need to be 2 lanes north of the river.  There&#8217;s never enough traffic there to warrant that as half the cars turn towards the mall/Foundry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
