Belgian pavers peeking through on Chestnut Street

The Belgian Pavers (aka cobblestones) are showing through the pot holes on Chestnut Street in the Jewelry District. I wonder if there are any long lost streetcar tracks down there somewhere.

, , , ,

15 Responses to Belgian pavers peeking through on Chestnut Street

  1. Corey February 10, 2011 at 5:52 pm #

    Most streets in Providence still have the granite pavers underneath. I wonder when we’ll stop wasting money paving the side streets over and over, and just rip up the asphalt. Obviously the old streets are built better than what’s on top of them.

  2. Amanda February 10, 2011 at 6:42 pm #

    so…flash mob with pick axes anyone? I think the pavement will come up pretty easy, we’ll be left with beauty, and then the city won’t have to worry about filling the potholes.

  3. Jef Nickerson February 10, 2011 at 9:53 pm #

    I was so tempted to start trying to pry up the pavement when I took the photos. But it was way too cold.

  4. Andy February 11, 2011 at 2:50 am #

    Why don’t we use pavers anymore? They appear to have lasted longer than most asphalt and also allows for water drainage, slows down cars and obviously is more visually appealing.

  5. RunawayJim February 11, 2011 at 8:46 am #

    I’m guessing snow removal is a problem on them. Think of a plow making a pothole. Now think of a plow hitting a bunch of pavers that have come loose.

  6. Jef Nickerson February 11, 2011 at 9:26 am #

    Pavers are not great for bikes, not really great for pedestrians (especially people in wheelchairs) in crosswalks (another surface *could* be used in crosswalks I suppose), and they tend to be expensive to install (properly). That said, I think they could certainly be used more often on smaller streets that get less through traffic.

  7. Jef Nickerson February 11, 2011 at 9:27 am #

    Of course I don’t think there is an example of blacktop being installed properly anywhere in Providence, so it is not like pavers are too hard to install and blacktop is easy.

  8. randy shapiro February 11, 2011 at 11:30 am #

    anyone mark these on the pothole map yet?

  9. Andy February 11, 2011 at 12:33 pm #


    There are plenty of plazas, markets, squares and streets across the world who still use pavers and who also probably get more accumulation then we do. Old Montreal; Meatpacking District, NYC; Thames Street, Newport; etc… Also, take a look at the paver side of Pine Street and West Fountain in Providence, those streets are pretty decent and considering the amount of snow removal we’ve had. Anywho…

  10. Corey February 11, 2011 at 6:58 pm #

    Pavers aren’t suitable for every street, it’s true. But they are good for side streets that are less heavily travelled. They are more expensive to install initially, but in most cases in Providence we wouldn’t really need to install them, just rip up the badly laid asphalt that’s on top of them. As for them being bad for pedestrians…huh? Seems to me that most of the great pedestrian areas of the world are full of cobblestone.

    It should be noted that a big part of the reason why the pavement here is so bad is the existence of the cobblestone below it. Think of it like painting over a surface that hasn’t been sanded. One material doesn’t adhere to the other, so the top layer comes off with a little wear. If you don’t rip up the stones, the pavement will never stick. So either we go back to stone, or we get rid of them altogether and repave.

  11. Jef Nickerson February 11, 2011 at 7:19 pm #

    They’re not good for pedestrians when not installed properly, i.e. Waterplace.

  12. Jef Nickerson February 11, 2011 at 7:52 pm #

    A place in Providence were pavers are installed well is Turks Head. The surface is fine except for where utility companies have torn them out and then just threw them back in the hole. Also, on Atwells at the arch, I think those are laid over a layer of concrete, the ones at Atwells and Dean were before they were removed recently.

    I would be curious to know however what people in wheelchairs think about Turks Head.

  13. RunawayJim February 12, 2011 at 5:28 pm #

    Waterplace is awful for walking. I don’t know that it’s how they were installed, but rather what was used. They’re not flat enough on top or small enough.

    The Turk’s Head area is fine, but I agree on the wheelchair comment. I’m sure it’s not easy.

    I actually think the pavers, if installed properly, might be nice on the side streets to keep people from flying up and down them.

  14. Peter Brassard February 12, 2011 at 6:26 pm #

    Even for half a block, Belgian blocks are terrible with bicycles. Perhaps when there’s room for bike lanes an asphalt bike lane could be situated next to a Belgian block roadway.

    Belgian block streets do really slow traffic. The noise of tires moving over the blocks could be annoying in residential areas.

    For pedestrians maybe a solution could be to grind the stone surface, so that it would be more uniform at least at crosswalks. Alternately, a crosswalk could be defined in a smoother material (asphalt or concrete), which would make the crosswalk stand out as the realm of the pedestrian.

  15. Andrew I February 13, 2011 at 12:14 pm #

    Thanks for saying most of what I was going to say, Peter B.
    Asphalt will take longer to break to break up if it is only used for the bike lane.
    Buses are very hard on pavements too: Another way streetcars save infrastructure dollars in the long run.

Leave a Reply