Categories

Pawtucket Commuter Rail Station Public Meeting – June 13, 2013

Did you want more transit news today? From the Pawtucket Foundation:


June 13th: 6PM – Commuter Rail Station Public Meeting

You are invited to attend a Rhode Island Department of Transportation and City of Pawtucket Public Meeting

Concerning the Potential Pawtucket Commuter Rail Station

Thursday, June 13, 2013
Open House: 6:00 PM
Presentation: 6:30 PM

Blackstone Valley Visitor’s Center
175 Main Street, Pawtucket, Rhode Island

pawtucket-commuter-rail-logoThe Rhode Island Department of Transportation (RIDOT) and the City of Pawtucket invite members of the community to a Public Meeting on Thursday June 13, 2013, to learn more about the Pawtucket Commuter Rail Station Project.

The meeting will take place at the Blackstone Valley Visitor’s Center, 175 Main Street, Pawtucket. Beginning at 6:00 PM, representatives from RIDOT, the City of Pawtucket, and the project team, will host an open house to discuss the project and answer questions. At 6:30 PM, RIDOT will present an overview of the Pawtucket Commuter Rail Project, which is exploring options for a potential station to reintroduce commuter rail service to Pawtucket. The Project will evaluate site, environmental, and rail impacts associated with a new station on the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) Providence Line.

The Blackstone Valley Visitor’s Center is located at RIPTA’s Pawtucket Transit Center and is accessible to persons with disabilities. Spanish translation services will be available at the meeting. Individuals who do not speak the English or Spanish languages or who are hearing impaired may contact RIDOT on or before June 6, 2013, to request an interpreter. Please direct interpreter requests to customerservice@dot.ri.gov or (401) 222-2450.

  • Si esta información es necesaria en otro idioma, llame al (401) 222-2450.
  • Se esta informacao e nevessario emu ma outro lingua, contate por favor (401) 222-2450.

, , ,

7 Responses to Pawtucket Commuter Rail Station Public Meeting – June 13, 2013

  1. Ryan June 11, 2013 at 4:09 pm #

    It looks like there’s no plans for anyone from RIPTA to be present at this hearing.

    Hey, about that whole “better integration between bus and rail” thing… anyone? Anyone? No?

  2. Tony P June 11, 2013 at 8:02 pm #

    It does not make sense to put a station in Pawtucket when there is one just a few minutes away in South Attleboro.

    It isn’t as though there aren’t enough stops on the Wickford to Boston line already.

  3. Jason June 11, 2013 at 8:29 pm #

    Tony P: it’s about serving urban customers who right now have no way to get to Boston without first hopping into a car or taking a fairly long bus ride in the opposite direction. Huge, dense area with lots of people in walking distance getting better connection to both PVD and BOS within an existing ROW and existing stop location has great potential for new riders/demand.

    Also, MBTA to Boston could be made much faster; adding this stop is not a part of the problem. Alon Levy has written several great posts about how to improve this line at: http://pedestrianobservations.wordpress.com/.

  4. Ryan June 11, 2013 at 9:53 pm #

    Tony P: No, there aren’t enough stops on the line between Westerly and Boston. We built two gigantic park-and-rides at great expense to cater to traffic on the line in 2035, but nobody cared enough to focus on the needs of the people who should have been (could have been) served by this line in 2013.

    I’m not just talking about building more urban infill stations, as Peter Brassard and others have suggested – Davisville Junction would have made for a better park-and-ride, a better gateway to Quonset Point through local bus service, a better opportunity for development in North Kingstown – on the whole, it would have made a better station.

    Similarly, T.F. Green Airport Station does a fantastic job of serving T.F. Green Airport and invalidates the need to build more garages in Warwick, but for actually serving people in Warwick, Apponaug Four Corners would have been a far better choice – especially given the notoriously horrendous road conditions at the eponymous Four Corners.

    The Amtrak stations that exist today and have existed for decades in Kingston and Westerly have a sizable ridership base that can be readily tapped for commuter rail, and require only minimal further investment relevant to the sizable amount of money that has been spent and is being spent on both stations today.

    And to your concern that so many stops is sure to slow a train beyond the point of usefulness, take a look at Metro-North’s New Haven Line – on which every single station between Harlem and Bridgeport is within 3 miles of the next one, and many even less than that. They make it work, and so can we.

    The New Haven Line is clearly divided right down the middle, in Stamford: trains to and from New Haven provide local service east of Stamford and run express west of Stamford, and service on the stations west of Stamford is largely provided by local trains that terminate there. Here in Rhode Island, we could run express trains that provide local service between Westerly and Providence and run express north of Providence, while local service between Providence and Boston could still be provided by the MBTA’s Providence Line (having been cut back to Providence Station.)

  5. Mental757 June 11, 2013 at 10:18 pm #

    With almost no hope of adding a 3rd or 4th track, perhaps South Attleboro would be closed. The vast majority of South Attleboro riders are from RI anyway. Just a thought…

  6. Ryan June 11, 2013 at 10:45 pm #

    What are you talking about, almost no hope? There’s easily enough room for a third track through South Attleboro, on the north side of the existing two. The Pond Street Overpass would need to be adjusted for it and you’d be butting up right against property lines at some points, but the only property you’d actually need to take is a row or two of parking in the South Attleboro lot. (And a whole lot of trees lining the ROW today would need to be chopped down, but…)

    There’s almost no hope of a fourth track, but you might be able to squeeze in a ~1250 foot siding/turnout on the south side of the existing tracks through the station, and that combined with the third track is likely sufficient especially if building Pawtucket Station means some trains no longer serve South Attleboro.

  7. barry June 12, 2013 at 12:09 pm #

    I too support the Pawtucket stop for a number of reasons including the ideas posted above. Also, a stop there opens up Pawtucket, a struggling city, to the valuable Boston market, and there is real potential for transit oriented development in the area nearby that needs help. Restoring our core cities is a big environmental goal. There can also be a market for express service between Providence (and maybe points south) and Pawtucket, a market that Ripta does not serve as their buses between the cities do not use I-95.

Leave a Reply